Software development
ISCO-08 2512, 2514Software engineer, Full-stack developer, Back-end developer, Front-end developer, Mobile developer, Tech lead
Headcount need, in FTE
Target AI skills
level 1 to 4Job skills
Growing in value
- Software architecture and system design
- Reviewing AI-generated code
- Turning business needs into precise specifications
- Test strategy and application security
- Supervising coding agents
Losing value
- Writing boilerplate and CRUD code
- Writing unit tests by hand
- Code documentation and comments
- Syntax mastery of a single language
- Simple framework migrations
How the job will change
Code generation tools already write a large share of routine code: data access layers, API connectors, unit tests, documentation, framework upgrades. Coding agents now take a ticket, change several files and open a pull request. Developers type less and read more, mostly code they did not write, which demands more attention than it seems.
The job moves towards design and accountability: framing the problem, choosing the architecture, deciding what an agent may touch and checking what it delivers. A good developer tomorrow will be judged on the quality of their specifications, their reviews and their grasp of the business domain, much less on raw coding speed. Security and maintainability remain human responsibilities.
- 2026-2027
- Code assistants everywhere; agents handle tests, documentation and simple tickets.
- 2028-2030
- Agents deliver complete features under human review; smaller teams per product.
- 2031+
- Developers mainly specify, design and validate; hand-written code becomes the exception.
Junior developers learned by writing simple code, which agents now produce. Without a deliberate apprenticeship path, companies will lack in five years the senior reviewers needed to supervise those agents. See the seniority outlook below.
What if you hired fewer juniors?
Your 2036 seniors are the juniors you hire today.
Advanced settings modified
2026 2036
The AI Cookbook 2026
albert's guide to cut through the noise around generative AI and turn it into workforce decisions.
- What AI actually changes in jobs and skills
- Why the junior pipeline matters more than most companies realise
- How to integrate AI into workforce planning

Run these scenarios on your actual workforce
AI Impact Diagnostic: 6 to 8 weeks, your data in albert, three costed scenarios and the projected seniority mix for each job family.
How the numbers are built
Every headcount figure combines four assumptions. Three come pre-filled from public research and job family defaults. The strategic ceiling is yours to set.
Seniority outlook
A flow model with three levels of experience in the profession. Promotion and exit rates are set so that today's mix stays stable when hiring does not change: any gap you see comes from the junior hiring cut alone.
Sources
- International Labour OrganizationGenerative AI and jobs: a refined global index of occupational exposure (2025)
- ILO datasetTask-level GenAI exposure scores by ISCO-08 occupation
- AnthropicAnthropic Economic Index (June 2026 release, April and May 2026 usage data)
- Stanford Digital Economy LabCanaries in the Coal Mine? Six facts about the recent employment effects of AI